Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association
79 F.3d 1415 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
Facts
Paul W. Douglass, a pro se litigant, sued USAA for age discrimination after being demoted. A magistrate judge recommended summary judgment for USAA, finding Douglass offered only subjective belief and no material fact issues. Douglass did not object to the report, which warned that failure to object would bar appeal of factual findings except for plain error or manifest injustice, and the district court accepted the recommendation.
Issue
The court considered the standard of appellate review when a party fails to object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, specifically whether failure to object to legal conclusions also bars appellate review, and if "manifest injustice" is a separate exception from "plain error."
Holding
The court affirmed the summary judgment for USAA. It revised its supervisory rule to state that failure to object timely to a magistrate judge's report bars appellate review of both proposed factual findings and legal conclusions, except upon grounds of plain error, provided proper notice was given. Douglass's case was reviewed under the former rule (de novo for legal conclusions) due to the warning he received, and the summary judgment was still affirmed.
Rule
A party's failure to file timely objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation bars that party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal both unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court, provided the party was served with notice of such consequences. The "manifest injustice" exception is eliminated as distinct from "plain error."
Read the full opinion on CourtListener
Case brief last reviewed . Prepared by CaseReader from the published opinion.