Richard D. BENNETT and Carole A. Bennett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Appellee
770 F.2d 308 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
Facts
Richard and Carole Bennett obtained loans from U.S. Trust to purchase public utility stock, which they deposited as collateral. They alleged U.S. Trust misrepresented that federal margin rules did not apply to such stock, leading to an undermargined account, a decline in stock value, and eventual liquidation resulting in significant financial losses. The Bennetts sued U.S. Trust under various federal and state laws, including Section 7, Section 10(b), and RICO.
Issue
The primary legal questions were whether a private cause of action exists under Section 7 of the Securities Exchange Act, whether the Bennetts adequately alleged loss causation for their Section 10(b) and state law fraud claims, and if a corporate entity can be simultaneously the 'person' and the 'enterprise' under RICO Section 1962(c).
Holding
The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of all claims. It held that no private right of action exists under Section 7, the Bennetts failed to establish the requisite loss causation for their fraud claims, and U.S. Trust could not be both the 'person' and the 'enterprise' for the RICO claim.
Rule
An implied private cause of action under a federal statute requires evidence of congressional intent to create such a remedy. For Section 10(b) and common law fraud claims, plaintiffs must demonstrate both transaction causation and loss causation, meaning the misrepresentation must directly cause the economic harm. Under RICO Section 1962(c), the 'person' conducting the racketeering activity must be a distinct entity from the 'enterprise'.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener
Case brief last reviewed . Prepared by CaseReader from the published opinion.